DarwinPropertyInsight.com

Homeopathic medical practice: long-term results of a cohort study with 3981 patients.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16266440
How healthy are chronically ill patients after eight years of homeopathic treatment?–Results from a long term observational study.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19091085?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_PMC&linkpos=1&log$=citedinpmcarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed
Homeopathic treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial. .
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16047154?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=2&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed
HARVARD: The silica hypothesis for homeopathy: physical chemistry.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17678816
Theoretical and Physical-Chemical Models for Dynamized Systems: Validation Criteria
http://www.springerlink.com/content/j426q3n151771p43/
Electrical impedance and HV plasma images of high dilutions of sodium chloride.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18657771?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=1&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed
Water Structure and Science
Memory of Water
http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/memory.html
http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/
The Structure Of Liquid Water; Novel Insights From Materials Research; Potential Relevance To Homeopathy
http://hpathy.com/research/Roy_Structure-of-Water.pdf
WEBCAST:
Preview
http://www.txoptions.com/videocast/nchwebcast.php
Audio
http://www.txoptions.com/videocast/nchwebcast.php
Ultradilute Ag-aquasols with extraordinary
bactericidal properties: role of the system
AgOH2O
http://docserver.ingentaconnect.com/deliver/connect/maney/14328917/v11n1/s2.pdf?expires=1235632774&id=49053538&titleid=75001644&accname=Guest+User&checksum=44B9F434D4195347AA5C7B86AA08CFC8
PROTECTION OF MICE FROM TULAREMIA INFECTION WITH ULTRA LOW SERIAL AGITATED DILUTIONS PREPARED FROM FRANCISELLA TULAREMIA INFECTED TISSUE
http://www.homeopathy.org/research/basic/14.1_jonas_dillner.pdf
CUBA: HOMEOPATHY STOPS EPIDEMIC
http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=9114&PID=84724
and
http://homeopathyresource.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/summary-of-cuban-experiences-on-leptospirosis-prevention-from-the-authors/
Ruta 6 selectively induces cell death in brain cancer cells but
proliferation in normal peripheral blood lymphocytes:
A novel treatment for human brain cancer
http://www.virtualtrials.com/pdf/ruta6.pdf
Effect of Homeopathic Medicines on Transplanted Tumors in
Mice
http://www.apocp.org/cancer_download/Volume8_No3/390-394%20c_Kuttan%205.pdf
Can homeopathic treatment slow prostate cancer growth?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17101763?ordinalpos=9&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel
Effects of homeopathic preparations on human prostate cancer growth in cellular and animal models.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17101766?ordinalpos=7&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
PEER REVIEW: HOMEOPATHY CLINICAL TRIALS http://www.sherwoodtowne.com/pb/wp_9eaaa71d.html
JOSEPHSON: NOBEL PRIZE WINNING PHYSICIST ON HOMEOPATHY
http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/water.memory/ns/homeopathy.html
TILLER: On Chemical Medicine, Thermodynamics, and Homeopathy
http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/acm.2006.12.685
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION: HOMEOPATHY APPROVED
http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/096_home.html
The in vitro evidence for an effect of high homeopathic potencies–a systematic review of the literature.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17544864
ENNIS: BENVENISTE VINDICATED
Replications by pan European labs
Histamine dilutions modulate basophil activation
Inflammation Research, v 53 #5, April 200
http://www.springerlink.com/content/dmby16rmj02dhxat/
Interview with Madeleine Ennis
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4152521,00.html
CALLINAN: HOW DOES HOMEOPATHY WORK?
http://www.marlev.com/HowItWorks.htm
ALLAN: BEYOND SUBSTANCE
Viral assays reveal action of high dilutes
http://www.normanallan.com/Sci/bs.html
CONTE, BERLIOCHI, LASGNE, VERNOT: THEORY OF HIGH DILUTIONS
http://high-dilutions.net/
ROY: THE SCIENCE OF WATER
http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/
IRIS BELLs HOMEOPATHY EVIDENCE RESEARCH BASE
http://homeopathyusa.org/uploads/Homeopathy_references.pdf
BRIZZI: HOMEOPATHIC AGRONOMY
A Biostatistical Insight into the As2O3 High Dilution Effects on the Rate and Variability of Wheat Seedling Growth
http://content.karger.com/produktedb/produkte.asp?typ=fulltext&file=10.1159/000087968
BENNETH: 100 YEARS OF EVIDENTIAL HOMEOPATHY
http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/about/

Duration : 0:9:15

Read more…

Technorati Tags: analysis, Benneth, challenge, DOLLAR, evidential, homeopath, homeopathic, homeopathy, James, John, Linde, meta, MILLION, proof, Randi, research

Youtube user olavius2 proves homeopathy. Read comments to find out how its done.

http://scienceofhomeopathy.com
Where Does Homeopathy Fit in Pharmacy Practice?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1847554/
Homeopathic medical practice: long-term results of a cohort study with 3981 patients.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16266440
How healthy are chronically ill patients after eight years of homeopathic treatment?–Results from a long term observational study.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19091085?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_PMC&linkpos=1&log$=citedinpmcarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed
Homeopathic treatment of children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled crossover trial. .
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16047154?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=2&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed
HARVARD: The silica hypothesis for homeopathy: physical chemistry.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17678816
Theoretical and Physical-Chemical Models for Dynamized Systems: Validation Criteria
http://www.springerlink.com/content/j426q3n151771p43/
Electrical impedance and HV plasma images of high dilutions of sodium chloride.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18657771?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed_Discovery_RA&linkpos=1&log$=relatedarticles&logdbfrom=pubmed
Water Structure and Science
Memory of Water
http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/memory.html
http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/
The Structure Of Liquid Water; Novel Insights From Materials Research; Potential Relevance To Homeopathy
http://hpathy.com/research/Roy_Structure-of-Water.pdf
WEBCAST:
Preview
http://www.txoptions.com/videocast/nchwebcast.php
Audio
http://www.txoptions.com/videocast/nchwebcast.php
Ultradilute Ag-aquasols with extraordinary
bactericidal properties: role of the system
AgOH2O
http://docserver.ingentaconnect.com/deliver/connect/maney/14328917/v11n1/s2.pdf?expires=1235632774&id=49053538&titleid=75001644&accname=Guest+User&checksum=44B9F434D4195347AA5C7B86AA08CFC8
PROTECTION OF MICE FROM TULAREMIA INFECTION WITH ULTRA LOW SERIAL AGITATED DILUTIONS PREPARED FROM FRANCISELLA TULAREMIA INFECTED TISSUE
http://www.homeopathy.org/research/basic/14.1_jonas_dillner.pdf
CUBA: HOMEOPATHY STOPS EPIDEMIC
http://www.hpathy.com/homeopathyforums/forum_posts.asp?TID=9114&PID=84724
and
http://homeopathyresource.wordpress.com/2009/01/17/summary-of-cuban-experiences-on-leptospirosis-prevention-from-the-authors/
Ruta 6 selectively induces cell death in brain cancer cells but
proliferation in normal peripheral blood lymphocytes:
A novel treatment for human brain cancer
http://www.virtualtrials.com/pdf/ruta6.pdf
Effect of Homeopathic Medicines on Transplanted Tumors in
Mice
http://www.apocp.org/cancer_download/Volume8_No3/390-394%20c_Kuttan%205.pdf
Can homeopathic treatment slow prostate cancer growth?
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17101763?ordinalpos=9&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel
Effects of homeopathic preparations on human prostate cancer growth in cellular and animal models.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17101766?ordinalpos=7&itool=EntrezSystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DefaultReportPanel.Pubmed_RVDocSum
PEER REVIEW: HOMEOPATHY CLINICAL TRIALS http://www.sherwoodtowne.com/pb/wp_9eaaa71d.html
JOSEPHSON: NOBEL PRIZE WINNING PHYSICIST ON HOMEOPATHY
http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~bdj10/water.memory/ns/homeopathy.html
TILLER: On Chemical Medicine, Thermodynamics, and Homeopathy
http://www.liebertonline.com/doi/abs/10.1089/acm.2006.12.685
FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION: HOMEOPATHY APPROVED
http://www.fda.gov/fdac/features/096_home.html
The in vitro evidence for an effect of high homeopathic potencies–a systematic review of the literature.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17544864
Replications by pan European labs
Histamine dilutions modulate basophil activation
Inflammation Research, v 53 #5, April 200
http://www.springerlink.com/content/dmby16rmj02dhxat/
Interview with Madeleine Ennis
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Archive/Article/0,4273,4152521,00.html
CALLINAN: HOW DOES HOMEOPATHY WORK?
http://www.marlev.com/HowItWorks.htm
ROY: THE SCIENCE OF WATER
http://www.lsbu.ac.uk/water/
IRIS BELLs HOMEOPATHY EVIDENCE RESEARCH BASE
http://homeopathyusa.org/uploads/Homeopathy_references.pdf
BRIZZI: HOMEOPATHIC AGRONOMY
A Biostatistical Insight into the As2O3 High Dilution Effects on the Rate and Variability of Wheat Seedling Growth
http://content.karger.com/produktedb/produkte.asp?typ=fulltext&file=10.1159/000087968
BENNETH: 100 YEARS OF EVIDENTIAL HOMEOPATHY
http://johnbenneth.wordpress.com/about/

Duration : 0:10:1

Read more…

Technorati Tags: Benneth, challenge, health, homeopath, homeopathic, homeopathy, metaphysics, proof, psychic, Randi, science, skeptic, technology

Interesting Quotations from Scientists on Evolutionism

“Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species.” (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)

“By the late 1970s, debates on university campuses throughout the free world were being held on the subject of origins with increasing frequency. Hundreds of scientists, who once accepted the theory of evolution as fact, were abandoning ship and claiming that the scientific evidence was in total support of the theory of creation. Well-known evolutionists, such as Isaac Asimov and Stephen Jay Gould, were stating that, since the creationist scientists had won all of the more than one hundred debates, the evolutionists should not debate them.” (Luther Sunderland, “Darwin’s Enigma”, p.10)

“I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme… (Dr. Karl Popper, German-born philosopher of science, called by Nobel Prize-winner Peter Medawar, “incomparably the greatest philosopher of science who has ever lived.”)

“The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory — is it then a science or faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation…” (Dr. L. Harrison Matthews, in the introduction to the 1971 edition of Darwin’s “Origin of Species”)

“What is so frustrating for our present purpose is that it seems almost impossible to give any numerical value to the probability of what seems a rather unlikely sequence of events… An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle… (Dr. Francis Crick, Nobel Prize-winner, codiscoverer of DNA)

“Once we see, however, that the probability of life originating at random is so utterly minuscule as to make it absurd, it becomes sensible to think that the favorable properties of physics, on which life depends, are in every respect DELIBERATE… It is therefore, almost inevitable that our own measure of intelligence must reflect higher intelligences.. even to the limit of God.” (Sir Fred Hoyle, British mathematician and astronomer, and Chandra Wickramasinghe, co-authors of “Evolution from Space,” after acknowledging that they had been atheists all their lives)

“The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein… I am at a loss to understand biologists’ widespread compulsion to deny what seems to me to be obvious.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)

“I don’t know how long it is going to be before astronomers generally recognize that the combinatorial arrangement of not even one among the many thousands of biopolymers on which life depends could have been arrived at by natural processes here on the earth. Astronomers will have a little difficulty in understanding this because they will be assured by biologists that it is not so, the biologists having been assured in their turn by others that it is not so. The ‘others’ are a group of persons who believe, quite openly, in mathematical miracles. They advocate the belief that tucked away in nature, outside of normal physics, there is a law which performs miracles (provided the miracles are in the aid of biology). This curious situation sits oddly on a profession that for long has been dedicated to coming up with logical explanations of biblical miracles… It is quite otherwise, however, with the modern miracle workers, who are always to be found living in the twilight fringes of thermodynamics.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)
(These “mathematical miracles” that must have occurred are summarized in my paper “The Second Law of Thermodynamics and Evolution”)

“To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest.” (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner).”

Duration : 0:9:58

Read more…

Technorati Tags: Agnostic, Atheism, Atheist, Barker, belief, bible, Bush, Charles, cheats, CHRISTIAN, coloring, cracks, create, Dan, Darwin, david, Dawkins, Delusion, dish, Early, Epstein, evolution, experiment, Faith, ferro, ferrofluid, fluid, food, gaming, George, God, Greg, hacker, hacks, household, hover, How, howto, ipod, James, KrogerFormer, make, Michael, milk, Mills, mix, onion, Proves, Psalms, Randi, richard, scepticism, science, scientist, Shermer, shoes, soap, Stephen, tech, to, Ulh, Zachary

Interesting Quotations from Scientists on Evolutionism

“Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species.” (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)

“By the late 1970s, debates on university campuses throughout the free world were being held on the subject of origins with increasing frequency. Hundreds of scientists, who once accepted the theory of evolution as fact, were abandoning ship and claiming that the scientific evidence was in total support of the theory of creation. Well-known evolutionists, such as Isaac Asimov and Stephen Jay Gould, were stating that, since the creationist scientists had won all of the more than one hundred debates, the evolutionists should not debate them.” (Luther Sunderland, “Darwin’s Enigma”, p.10)

“I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme… (Dr. Karl Popper, German-born philosopher of science, called by Nobel Prize-winner Peter Medawar, “incomparably the greatest philosopher of science who has ever lived.”)

“The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory — is it then a science or faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation…” (Dr. L. Harrison Matthews, in the introduction to the 1971 edition of Darwin’s “Origin of Species”)

“What is so frustrating for our present purpose is that it seems almost impossible to give any numerical value to the probability of what seems a rather unlikely sequence of events… An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle… (Dr. Francis Crick, Nobel Prize-winner, codiscoverer of DNA)

“Once we see, however, that the probability of life originating at random is so utterly minuscule as to make it absurd, it becomes sensible to think that the favorable properties of physics, on which life depends, are in every respect DELIBERATE… It is therefore, almost inevitable that our own measure of intelligence must reflect higher intelligences.. even to the limit of God.” (Sir Fred Hoyle, British mathematician and astronomer, and Chandra Wickramasinghe, co-authors of “Evolution from Space,” after acknowledging that they had been atheists all their lives)

“The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein… I am at a loss to understand biologists’ widespread compulsion to deny what seems to me to be obvious.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)

“I don’t know how long it is going to be before astronomers generally recognize that the combinatorial arrangement of not even one among the many thousands of biopolymers on which life depends could have been arrived at by natural processes here on the earth. Astronomers will have a little difficulty in understanding this because they will be assured by biologists that it is not so, the biologists having been assured in their turn by others that it is not so. The ‘others’ are a group of persons who believe, quite openly, in mathematical miracles. They advocate the belief that tucked away in nature, outside of normal physics, there is a law which performs miracles (provided the miracles are in the aid of biology). This curious situation sits oddly on a profession that for long has been dedicated to coming up with logical explanations of biblical miracles… It is quite otherwise, however, with the modern miracle workers, who are always to be found living in the twilight fringes of thermodynamics.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)
(These “mathematical miracles” that must have occurred are summarized in my paper “The Second Law of Thermodynamics and Evolution”)

“To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest.” (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner)

Duration : 0:9:43

Read more…

Technorati Tags: Agnostic, Atheism, Atheist, Barker, belief, bible, Bush, Charles, cheats, CHRISTIAN, coloring, cracks, create, Dan, Darwin, david, Dawkins, Delusion, dish, Early, Epstein, evolution, experiment, Faith, ferro, ferrofluid, fluid, food, gaming, George, God, Greg, hacker, hacks, household, hover, How, howto, ipod, James, KrogerFormer, make, Michael, milk, Mills, mix, onion, Proves, Psalms, Randi, richard, scepticism, science, scientist, Shermer, shoes, soap, Stephen, tech, to, Ulh, Zachary

Interesting Quotations from Scientists on Evolutionism

“Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species.” (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)

“By the late 1970s, debates on university campuses throughout the free world were being held on the subject of origins with increasing frequency. Hundreds of scientists, who once accepted the theory of evolution as fact, were abandoning ship and claiming that the scientific evidence was in total support of the theory of creation. Well-known evolutionists, such as Isaac Asimov and Stephen Jay Gould, were stating that, since the creationist scientists had won all of the more than one hundred debates, the evolutionists should not debate them.” (Luther Sunderland, “Darwin’s Enigma”, p.10)

“I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme… (Dr. Karl Popper, German-born philosopher of science, called by Nobel Prize-winner Peter Medawar, “incomparably the greatest philosopher of science who has ever lived.”)

“The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory — is it then a science or faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation…” (Dr. L. Harrison Matthews, in the introduction to the 1971 edition of Darwin’s “Origin of Species”)

“What is so frustrating for our present purpose is that it seems almost impossible to give any numerical value to the probability of what seems a rather unlikely sequence of events… An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle… (Dr. Francis Crick, Nobel Prize-winner, codiscoverer of DNA)

“Once we see, however, that the probability of life originating at random is so utterly minuscule as to make it absurd, it becomes sensible to think that the favorable properties of physics, on which life depends, are in every respect DELIBERATE… It is therefore, almost inevitable that our own measure of intelligence must reflect higher intelligences.. even to the limit of God.” (Sir Fred Hoyle, British mathematician and astronomer, and Chandra Wickramasinghe, co-authors of “Evolution from Space,” after acknowledging that they had been atheists all their lives)

“The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein… I am at a loss to understand biologists’ widespread compulsion to deny what seems to me to be obvious.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)

“I don’t know how long it is going to be before astronomers generally recognize that the combinatorial arrangement of not even one among the many thousands of biopolymers on which life depends could have been arrived at by natural processes here on the earth. Astronomers will have a little difficulty in understanding this because they will be assured by biologists that it is not so, the biologists having been assured in their turn by others that it is not so. The ‘others’ are a group of persons who believe, quite openly, in mathematical miracles. They advocate the belief that tucked away in nature, outside of normal physics, there is a law which performs miracles (provided the miracles are in the aid of biology). This curious situation sits oddly on a profession that for long has been dedicated to coming up with logical explanations of biblical miracles… It is quite otherwise, however, with the modern miracle workers, who are always to be found living in the twilight fringes of thermodynamics.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)
(These “mathematical miracles” that must have occurred are summarized in my paper “The Second Law of Thermodynamics and Evolution”)

“To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest.” (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner)

Duration : 0:10:6

Read more…

Technorati Tags: Agnostic, Atheism, Atheist, Barker, belief, bible, Bush, Charles, cheats, CHRISTIAN, coloring, cracks, create, Dan, Darwin, david, Dawkins, Delusion, dish, Epstein, evolution, experiment, Faith, ferro, ferrofluid, fluid, food, gaming, George, God, Greg, hacker, hacks, household, hover, How, howto, ipod, James, Kroger, make, Michael, milk, Mills, mix, onion, Psalms, Randi, richard, scepticism, science, scientist, Shermer, shoes, soap, Stephen, tech, to, Ulh, Zachary

Interesting Quotations from Scientists on Evolutionism

“Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species.” (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)

“By the late 1970s, debates on university campuses throughout the free world were being held on the subject of origins with increasing frequency. Hundreds of scientists, who once accepted the theory of evolution as fact, were abandoning ship and claiming that the scientific evidence was in total support of the theory of creation. Well-known evolutionists, such as Isaac Asimov and Stephen Jay Gould, were stating that, since the creationist scientists had won all of the more than one hundred debates, the evolutionists should not debate them.” (Luther Sunderland, “Darwin’s Enigma”, p.10)

“I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme… (Dr. Karl Popper, German-born philosopher of science, called by Nobel Prize-winner Peter Medawar, “incomparably the greatest philosopher of science who has ever lived.”)

“The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory — is it then a science or faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation…” (Dr. L. Harrison Matthews, in the introduction to the 1971 edition of Darwin’s “Origin of Species”)

“What is so frustrating for our present purpose is that it seems almost impossible to give any numerical value to the probability of what seems a rather unlikely sequence of events… An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle… (Dr. Francis Crick, Nobel Prize-winner, codiscoverer of DNA)

“Once we see, however, that the probability of life originating at random is so utterly minuscule as to make it absurd, it becomes sensible to think that the favorable properties of physics, on which life depends, are in every respect DELIBERATE… It is therefore, almost inevitable that our own measure of intelligence must reflect higher intelligences.. even to the limit of God.” (Sir Fred Hoyle, British mathematician and astronomer, and Chandra Wickramasinghe, co-authors of “Evolution from Space,” after acknowledging that they had been atheists all their lives)

“The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein… I am at a loss to understand biologists’ widespread compulsion to deny what seems to me to be obvious.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)

“I don’t know how long it is going to be before astronomers generally recognize that the combinatorial arrangement of not even one among the many thousands of biopolymers on which life depends could have been arrived at by natural processes here on the earth. Astronomers will have a little difficulty in understanding this because they will be assured by biologists that it is not so, the biologists having been assured in their turn by others that it is not so. The ‘others’ are a group of persons who believe, quite openly, in mathematical miracles. They advocate the belief that tucked away in nature, outside of normal physics, there is a law which performs miracles (provided the miracles are in the aid of biology). This curious situation sits oddly on a profession that for long has been dedicated to coming up with logical explanations of biblical miracles… It is quite otherwise, however, with the modern miracle workers, who are always to be found living in the twilight fringes of thermodynamics.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)
(These “mathematical miracles” that must have occurred are summarized in my paper “The Second Law of Thermodynamics and Evolution”)

“To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest.” (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner)

Duration : 0:9:23

Read more…

Technorati Tags: Agnostic, Atheism, Atheist, Barker, belief, bible, Bush, Charles, cheats, CHRISTIAN, coloring, cracks, create, Dan, Darwin, david, Dawkins, Delusion, dish, Early, Epstein, evolution, experiment, Faith, ferro, ferrofluid, fluid, food, gaming, George, God, Greg, hacker, hacks, household, hover, How, howto, ipod, James, KrogerFormer, make, Michael, milk, Mills, mix, onion, Proves, Psalms, Randi, richard, scepticism, science, scientist, Shermer, shoes, soap, Stephen, tech, to, Ulh, Zachary

Interesting Quotations from Scientists on Evolutionism

“Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species.” (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)

“By the late 1970s, debates on university campuses throughout the free world were being held on the subject of origins with increasing frequency. Hundreds of scientists, who once accepted the theory of evolution as fact, were abandoning ship and claiming that the scientific evidence was in total support of the theory of creation. Well-known evolutionists, such as Isaac Asimov and Stephen Jay Gould, were stating that, since the creationist scientists had won all of the more than one hundred debates, the evolutionists should not debate them.” (Luther Sunderland, “Darwin’s Enigma”, p.10)

“I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme… (Dr. Karl Popper, German-born philosopher of science, called by Nobel Prize-winner Peter Medawar, “incomparably the greatest philosopher of science who has ever lived.”)

“The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory — is it then a science or faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation…” (Dr. L. Harrison Matthews, in the introduction to the 1971 edition of Darwin’s “Origin of Species”)

“What is so frustrating for our present purpose is that it seems almost impossible to give any numerical value to the probability of what seems a rather unlikely sequence of events… An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle… (Dr. Francis Crick, Nobel Prize-winner, codiscoverer of DNA)

“Once we see, however, that the probability of life originating at random is so utterly minuscule as to make it absurd, it becomes sensible to think that the favorable properties of physics, on which life depends, are in every respect DELIBERATE… It is therefore, almost inevitable that our own measure of intelligence must reflect higher intelligences.. even to the limit of God.” (Sir Fred Hoyle, British mathematician and astronomer, and Chandra Wickramasinghe, co-authors of “Evolution from Space,” after acknowledging that they had been atheists all their lives)

“The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein… I am at a loss to understand biologists’ widespread compulsion to deny what seems to me to be obvious.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)

“I don’t know how long it is going to be before astronomers generally recognize that the combinatorial arrangement of not even one among the many thousands of biopolymers on which life depends could have been arrived at by natural processes here on the earth. Astronomers will have a little difficulty in understanding this because they will be assured by biologists that it is not so, the biologists having been assured in their turn by others that it is not so. The ‘others’ are a group of persons who believe, quite openly, in mathematical miracles. They advocate the belief that tucked away in nature, outside of normal physics, there is a law which performs miracles (provided the miracles are in the aid of biology). This curious situation sits oddly on a profession that for long has been dedicated to coming up with logical explanations of biblical miracles… It is quite otherwise, however, with the modern miracle workers, who are always to be found living in the twilight fringes of thermodynamics.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)
(These “mathematical miracles” that must have occurred are summarized in my paper “The Second Law of Thermodynamics and Evolution”)

“To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest.” (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner)

Duration : 0:9:22

Read more…

Technorati Tags: Agnostic, Atheism, Atheist, Barker, belief, bible, Bush, Charles, cheats, CHRISTIAN, coloring, cracks, create, Dan, Darwin, david, Dawkins, Delusion, dish, Early, Epstein, evolution, experiment, Faith, ferro, ferrofluid, fluid, food, gaming, George, God, Greg, hacker, hacks, household, hover, How, howto, ipod, James, KrogerFormer, make, Michael, milk, Mills, mix, onion, Proves, Psalms, Randi, richard, scepticism, science, scientist, Shermer, shoes, soap, Stephen, tech, to, Ulh, Zachary

Interesting Quotations from Scientists on Evolutionism

“Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species.” (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)

“By the late 1970s, debates on university campuses throughout the free world were being held on the subject of origins with increasing frequency. Hundreds of scientists, who once accepted the theory of evolution as fact, were abandoning ship and claiming that the scientific evidence was in total support of the theory of creation. Well-known evolutionists, such as Isaac Asimov and Stephen Jay Gould, were stating that, since the creationist scientists had won all of the more than one hundred debates, the evolutionists should not debate them.” (Luther Sunderland, “Darwin’s Enigma”, p.10)

“I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme… (Dr. Karl Popper, German-born philosopher of science, called by Nobel Prize-winner Peter Medawar, “incomparably the greatest philosopher of science who has ever lived.”)

“The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory — is it then a science or faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation…” (Dr. L. Harrison Matthews, in the introduction to the 1971 edition of Darwin’s “Origin of Species”)

“What is so frustrating for our present purpose is that it seems almost impossible to give any numerical value to the probability of what seems a rather unlikely sequence of events… An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle… (Dr. Francis Crick, Nobel Prize-winner, codiscoverer of DNA)

“Once we see, however, that the probability of life originating at random is so utterly minuscule as to make it absurd, it becomes sensible to think that the favorable properties of physics, on which life depends, are in every respect DELIBERATE… It is therefore, almost inevitable that our own measure of intelligence must reflect higher intelligences.. even to the limit of God.” (Sir Fred Hoyle, British mathematician and astronomer, and Chandra Wickramasinghe, co-authors of “Evolution from Space,” after acknowledging that they had been atheists all their lives)

“The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein… I am at a loss to understand biologists’ widespread compulsion to deny what seems to me to be obvious.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)

“I don’t know how long it is going to be before astronomers generally recognize that the combinatorial arrangement of not even one among the many thousands of biopolymers on which life depends could have been arrived at by natural processes here on the earth. Astronomers will have a little difficulty in understanding this because they will be assured by biologists that it is not so, the biologists having been assured in their turn by others that it is not so. The ‘others’ are a group of persons who believe, quite openly, in mathematical miracles. They advocate the belief that tucked away in nature, outside of normal physics, there is a law which performs miracles (provided the miracles are in the aid of biology). This curious situation sits oddly on a profession that for long has been dedicated to coming up with logical explanations of biblical miracles… It is quite otherwise, however, with the modern miracle workers, who are always to be found living in the twilight fringes of thermodynamics.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)
(These “mathematical miracles” that must have occurred are summarized in my paper “The Second Law of Thermodynamics and Evolution”)

“To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest.” (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner)

Duration : 0:9:51

Read more…

Technorati Tags: Agnostic, Atheism, Atheist, Barker, belief, bible, Bush, Charles, cheats, CHRISTIAN, coloring, cracks, create, Dan, Darwin, david, Dawkins, Delusion, dish, Epstein, evolution, experiment, Faith, ferro, ferrofluid, fluid, food, gaming, George, God, Greg, hacker, hacks, household, hover, How, howto, ipod, James, Kroger, make, Michael, milk, Mills, mix, onion, Psalms, Randi, richard, scepticism, science, scientist, Shermer, shoes, soap, Stephen, tech, to, Ulh, Zachary

Interesting Quotations from Scientists on Evolutionism

“Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species.” (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)

“By the late 1970s, debates on university campuses throughout the free world were being held on the subject of origins with increasing frequency. Hundreds of scientists, who once accepted the theory of evolution as fact, were abandoning ship and claiming that the scientific evidence was in total support of the theory of creation. Well-known evolutionists, such as Isaac Asimov and Stephen Jay Gould, were stating that, since the creationist scientists had won all of the more than one hundred debates, the evolutionists should not debate them.” (Luther Sunderland, “Darwin’s Enigma”, p.10)

“I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme… (Dr. Karl Popper, German-born philosopher of science, called by Nobel Prize-winner Peter Medawar, “incomparably the greatest philosopher of science who has ever lived.”)

“The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory — is it then a science or faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation…” (Dr. L. Harrison Matthews, in the introduction to the 1971 edition of Darwin’s “Origin of Species”)

“What is so frustrating for our present purpose is that it seems almost impossible to give any numerical value to the probability of what seems a rather unlikely sequence of events… An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle… (Dr. Francis Crick, Nobel Prize-winner, codiscoverer of DNA)

“Once we see, however, that the probability of life originating at random is so utterly minuscule as to make it absurd, it becomes sensible to think that the favorable properties of physics, on which life depends, are in every respect DELIBERATE… It is therefore, almost inevitable that our own measure of intelligence must reflect higher intelligences.. even to the limit of God.” (Sir Fred Hoyle, British mathematician and astronomer, and Chandra Wickramasinghe, co-authors of “Evolution from Space,” after acknowledging that they had been atheists all their lives)

“The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein… I am at a loss to understand biologists’ widespread compulsion to deny what seems to me to be obvious.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)

“I don’t know how long it is going to be before astronomers generally recognize that the combinatorial arrangement of not even one among the many thousands of biopolymers on which life depends could have been arrived at by natural processes here on the earth. Astronomers will have a little difficulty in understanding this because they will be assured by biologists that it is not so, the biologists having been assured in their turn by others that it is not so. The ‘others’ are a group of persons who believe, quite openly, in mathematical miracles. They advocate the belief that tucked away in nature, outside of normal physics, there is a law which performs miracles (provided the miracles are in the aid of biology). This curious situation sits oddly on a profession that for long has been dedicated to coming up with logical explanations of biblical miracles… It is quite otherwise, however, with the modern miracle workers, who are always to be found living in the twilight fringes of thermodynamics.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)
(These “mathematical miracles” that must have occurred are summarized in my paper “The Second Law of Thermodynamics and Evolution”)

“To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest.” (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner)

Duration : 0:6:49

Read more…

Technorati Tags: Agnostic, Atheism, Atheist, Barker, belief, bible, Bush, Charles, cheats, CHRISTIAN, coloring, cracks, create, Dan, Darwin, david, Dawkins, Delusion, dish, Epstein, evolution, experiment, Faith, ferro, ferrofluid, fluid, food, gaming, George, God, Greg, hacker, hacks, household, hover, How, howto, ipod, James, Kroger, make, Michael, milk, Mills, mix, onion, Psalms, Randi, richard, scepticism, science, scientist, Shermer, shoes, soap, Stephen, tech, to, Ulh, Zachary

Interesting Quotations from Scientists on Evolutionism

“Nine-tenths of the talk of evolutionists is sheer nonsense, not founded on observation and wholly unsupported by facts. This museum is full of proofs of the utter falsity of their views. In all this great museum, there is not a particle of evidence of the transmutation of species.” (Dr. Etheridge, Paleontologist of the British Museum)

“By the late 1970s, debates on university campuses throughout the free world were being held on the subject of origins with increasing frequency. Hundreds of scientists, who once accepted the theory of evolution as fact, were abandoning ship and claiming that the scientific evidence was in total support of the theory of creation. Well-known evolutionists, such as Isaac Asimov and Stephen Jay Gould, were stating that, since the creationist scientists had won all of the more than one hundred debates, the evolutionists should not debate them.” (Luther Sunderland, “Darwin’s Enigma”, p.10)

“I have come to the conclusion that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory, but a metaphysical research programme… (Dr. Karl Popper, German-born philosopher of science, called by Nobel Prize-winner Peter Medawar, “incomparably the greatest philosopher of science who has ever lived.”)

“The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an unproved theory — is it then a science or faith? Belief in the theory of evolution is thus exactly parallel to belief in special creation…” (Dr. L. Harrison Matthews, in the introduction to the 1971 edition of Darwin’s “Origin of Species”)

“What is so frustrating for our present purpose is that it seems almost impossible to give any numerical value to the probability of what seems a rather unlikely sequence of events… An honest man, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, could only state that in some sense, the origin of life appears at the moment to be almost a miracle… (Dr. Francis Crick, Nobel Prize-winner, codiscoverer of DNA)

“Once we see, however, that the probability of life originating at random is so utterly minuscule as to make it absurd, it becomes sensible to think that the favorable properties of physics, on which life depends, are in every respect DELIBERATE… It is therefore, almost inevitable that our own measure of intelligence must reflect higher intelligences.. even to the limit of God.” (Sir Fred Hoyle, British mathematician and astronomer, and Chandra Wickramasinghe, co-authors of “Evolution from Space,” after acknowledging that they had been atheists all their lives)

“The chance that higher life forms might have emerged in this way is comparable with the chance that a tornado sweeping through a junk-yard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein… I am at a loss to understand biologists’ widespread compulsion to deny what seems to me to be obvious.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)

“I don’t know how long it is going to be before astronomers generally recognize that the combinatorial arrangement of not even one among the many thousands of biopolymers on which life depends could have been arrived at by natural processes here on the earth. Astronomers will have a little difficulty in understanding this because they will be assured by biologists that it is not so, the biologists having been assured in their turn by others that it is not so. The ‘others’ are a group of persons who believe, quite openly, in mathematical miracles. They advocate the belief that tucked away in nature, outside of normal physics, there is a law which performs miracles (provided the miracles are in the aid of biology). This curious situation sits oddly on a profession that for long has been dedicated to coming up with logical explanations of biblical miracles… It is quite otherwise, however, with the modern miracle workers, who are always to be found living in the twilight fringes of thermodynamics.” (Sir Fred Hoyle)
(These “mathematical miracles” that must have occurred are summarized in my paper “The Second Law of Thermodynamics and Evolution”)

“To postulate that the development and survival of the fittest is entirely a consequence of chance mutations seems to me a hypothesis based on no evidence and irreconcilable with the facts. These classical evolutionary theories are a gross over-simplification of an immensely complex and intricate mass of facts, and it amazes me that they are swallowed so uncritically and readily, and for such a long time, by so many scientists without murmur of protest.” (Sir Ernest Chain, Nobel Prize winner)

Duration : 0:3:54

Read more…

Technorati Tags: Agnostic, Atheism, Atheist, Barker, belief, bible, Bush, Charles, cheats, CHRISTIAN, coloring, cracks, create, Dan, Darwin, david, Dawkins, Delusion, dish, Epstein, evolution, experiment, Faith, ferro, ferrofluid, fluid, food, gaming, George, God, Greg, hacker, hacks, household, hover, How, howto, ipod, James, Kroger, make, Michael, milk, Mills, mix, onion, Psalms, Randi, richard, scepticism, science, scientist, Shermer, shoes, soap, Stephen, tech, to, Ulh, Zachary